From the origins of the SRI to the question of what a good score brings today — the key building blocks at a glance.
Where the SRI comes from
The SRI was introduced with the amendment of the EU Buildings Directive (EPBD) in 2018 (Directive (EU) 2018/844, Article 8 and Annex Ia). The EU Commission laid down the specific assessment methodology at the end of 2020 in two legal acts: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2155 defines the SRI and the common calculation method, and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2156 governs the arrangements for implementation — including the voluntary test phase in which member states may participate. In the 2024 recast of the EPBD (Directive (EU) 2024/1275, Article 15 “Smart readiness of buildings”) the SRI was confirmed and given a concrete roadmap — see in detail the page State of regulation.
The three key functionalities
The SRI assesses building technology by what it delivers for three overarching goals:
DOMAINS, IMPACTS, SERVICES, FUNCTIONALITY LEVELS
The assessment runs along nine technical domains: heating, cooling, domestic hot water, ventilation, lighting, dynamic building envelope, electricity, electric mobility (charging points) and monitoring and control. Each domain contains defined services — up to 54 in total, such as “control of heat emission” or “detection of faults in technical systems”. For each service relevant to the building a functionality level from 0 (not smart / manual) to 4 (highly automated, connected, predictive) is determined. The levels are weighted across seven impact criteria (including energy efficiency, comfort, health and well-being, information for users, energy flexibility) and combined into domain, functionality and overall scores.
The weighting is done across seven impact criteria (impacts). They describe what a smart service contributes to — from energy efficiency to informing users:
Method A and Method B
Which method is admissible for what is defined by the member states as part of their implementation.
How levels become a score
A simplified example: in the heating domain, heat emission is controlled automatically per room individually (level 2 of 4 for this service), while generation follows outdoor temperature (level 1). Both services contribute — with different weights — to impact criteria such as energy efficiency and comfort. This produces a degree of fulfilment per domain: points achieved relative to the maximum possible for the building.
The maximum value depends on the services actually relevant to the building – a building without cooling is not penalised for missing cooling services. The SRI therefore assesses how intelligent a building is within its technical possibilities, and not the mere amount of installed technology.
Exceptions are cases in which a member state mandates the compulsory inclusion and assessment of a particular domain.
Why rely on the SRI?
The SRI offers a standardised assessment model for the “smartness” or “smart readiness” of buildings — above all with regard to building technology. The uniform assessment methodology makes it easier to compare buildings, to make well-founded investment decisions and to implement smart technologies broadly and purposefully in the building sector.
Is the SRI the same in every country? The methodology is defined uniformly across the EU so that results are comparable. How and to what extent the SRI is used is, however, decided by the member states — see the page State of regulation.